Skip to main content
Once you have a draft, most of the work is adjustment rather than rewriting. Say what’s wrong with it in the same thread and you keep everything the draft already got right.

​
Fixing a specific thing

Each of these is a distinct request — naming the one you want beats “make it better”. You can type them, or open Quick Actions in the editor’s chat panel and pick one:
The Quick Actions panel listing Rewrite this post, Make it sharper, Improve the hook and Improve the CTA
The panel scrolls, so the four visible here are the start of the list rather than all of it:

​
Changing who it’s for, or how it sounds

Ask for one change at a time. “Make it shorter and punchier and add proof and mention the product” produces a draft that does none of them well, and you can’t tell which instruction caused what.

​
One-click actions

When a chat is attached to a post, these appear as buttons above the message box, so you don’t have to type the instruction. Same actions, fewer keystrokes.

​
Knowing when to stop

Each pass moves the draft, but not always forward. Two or three rounds is usually where it peaks; past that you tend to sand off the specifics that made it yours. If you’re several passes in and it’s worse, go back to an earlier version rather than asking for another rewrite. The editor keeps revisions.
Humanize and apply my brand voice are not the same request. The first makes text read less like a machine; the second makes it read like you. If output is fluent but anonymous, the second is the one you want — and if that doesn’t help, the problem is your brand voice setup, not the prompt.

Create a post

Where the draft comes from.

Give chat the right context

Why fewer sources help when improving.

Edit a post

Revisions, and finishing the draft.

Repurpose

When it’s right but wants another format.